Section 167 to 173 (Cr.P.C)
REPORT OF POLICE-OFFICER
2012 SCMR 229
report under S.5(1) of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, can be equated as report under S.173, Cr.P.C.
2012 SCMR 59
No motive was alleged in F.I.R. against accused and police after due investigation submitted Challan/report under S.173, Cr.P.C. before Court of Sessions who entrusted to Additional Sessions judge who
2012 PLD 179 SC
Accused persons were declared innocent during investigation but Trial Court summoned them to face the trial---Plea raised by accused persons was that summoning them by Trial Court to face trial had
2011 SCMR 508
Case registered under F.I.R., was disposed of by Magistrate under "C" class as no sufficient evidence was available---Against the order of Magistrate, complainant filed application under S. 561-A, Cr.
2011 SCMR 508
Ss. 169 & 173---Police report---Magistrate, jurisdiction of---Magistrate competent to take cognizance of offence can pass order on the report of police
2011 SCMR 1354
Discharge of accused by Trial Court on basis of report of Investigating Officer submitted under S. 169, Cr. P. C. ---Validity--Question of determination of guilt or innocence of accused squarely fell
2010 SCMR 1791
S. 173---Finding of police---Scope--Finding of police is not binding on court and investigating agency has the only duty under law to collect evidence
2009 SCMR 181
If final report cannot possibly be submitted before or after completion of investigation period prescribed under S.167, Cr.P.C., the Investigating Agency should strictly adhere to the provisions of S.
2007 SCMR 393
F.I.R., registration of---Superintendent of Police (Investigation) finding F.I.R. to be false---Quashment of F.I.R. by High Court on basis of ipsi dixit of police---Validity---High Court should have
2007 PLD 31 SC
As investigation report (challan) had already reached Trial Court, where trial had already commenced, changing of investigation or ordering further investigation in the matter thereafter was an
2006 SCMR 373
Ss. 156 & 173---Reinvestigation---System
2006 SCMR 1547
Everyone was entitled under the Constitution to protection and was entitled to get justice in all circumstances but attitude of police was irresponsible and on account of such attitude, mother of
1997 SCMR 1503
High Court although cannot press into service Ss.435 to 439, Cr.P.C. in a case in which a Magistrate concurs with the report of an Investigating Officer under S. 173, Cr.P.C., but it can invoke aid of
1994 SCMR 2177
Taking cognizance of criminal case by Court---Procedure detailed.
REPORT OF POLICE-OFFICER
2012 SCMR 229
report under S.5(1) of Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, can be equated as report under S.173, Cr.P.C.
2012 SCMR 59
No motive was alleged in F.I.R. against accused and police after due investigation submitted Challan/report under S.173, Cr.P.C. before Court of Sessions who entrusted to Additional Sessions judge who
2012 PLD 179 SC
Accused persons were declared innocent during investigation but Trial Court summoned them to face the trial---Plea raised by accused persons was that summoning them by Trial Court to face trial had
2011 SCMR 508
Case registered under F.I.R., was disposed of by Magistrate under "C" class as no sufficient evidence was available---Against the order of Magistrate, complainant filed application under S. 561-A, Cr.
2011 SCMR 508
Ss. 169 & 173---Police report---Magistrate, jurisdiction of---Magistrate competent to take cognizance of offence can pass order on the report of police
2011 SCMR 1354
Discharge of accused by Trial Court on basis of report of Investigating Officer submitted under S. 169, Cr. P. C. ---Validity--Question of determination of guilt or innocence of accused squarely fell
2010 SCMR 1791
S. 173---Finding of police---Scope--Finding of police is not binding on court and investigating agency has the only duty under law to collect evidence
2009 SCMR 181
If final report cannot possibly be submitted before or after completion of investigation period prescribed under S.167, Cr.P.C., the Investigating Agency should strictly adhere to the provisions of S.
2007 SCMR 393
F.I.R., registration of---Superintendent of Police (Investigation) finding F.I.R. to be false---Quashment of F.I.R. by High Court on basis of ipsi dixit of police---Validity---High Court should have
2007 PLD 31 SC
As investigation report (challan) had already reached Trial Court, where trial had already commenced, changing of investigation or ordering further investigation in the matter thereafter was an
2006 SCMR 373
Ss. 156 & 173---Reinvestigation---System
2006 SCMR 1547
Everyone was entitled under the Constitution to protection and was entitled to get justice in all circumstances but attitude of police was irresponsible and on account of such attitude, mother of
1997 SCMR 1503
High Court although cannot press into service Ss.435 to 439, Cr.P.C. in a case in which a Magistrate concurs with the report of an Investigating Officer under S. 173, Cr.P.C., but it can invoke aid of
1994 SCMR 2177
Taking cognizance of criminal case by Court---Procedure detailed.
No comments:
Post a Comment