Vakalatnama
2010 PLD 657 SC
O. III, Rr. 3, 4 & O.XXIII, Rr. 1(1), (3)---Advocate's power to compromise or abandon claim on behalf of his client---Scope---Advocate in his discretion could do so in interest of his client, unless his...........
2008 SCMR 896
-Power to compound or settle the matter was vested with the parties and counsel would act according to the instructions given to him by the party and could enter into compromise only where VAKALATNAMA specifically
2004 SCMR 1522
-Art. 185(3)---Counsel and client---High Court had dismissed the Criminal Revision petition of the accused as not pressed by the counsel---Contention of the accused was that he had not instructed the counsel to...
2010 PLD 657 SC
O. III, Rr. 3, 4 & O.XXIII, Rr. 1(1), (3)---Advocate's power to compromise or abandon claim on behalf of his client---Scope---Advocate in his discretion could do so in interest of his client, unless his...........
2008 SCMR 896
-Power to compound or settle the matter was vested with the parties and counsel would act according to the instructions given to him by the party and could enter into compromise only where VAKALATNAMA specifically
2004 SCMR 1522
-Art. 185(3)---Counsel and client---High Court had dismissed the Criminal Revision petition of the accused as not pressed by the counsel---Contention of the accused was that he had not instructed the counsel to...
No comments:
Post a Comment