CURRICULUM
The term curriculum refers to the lessons and academic
content taught in a school or in a specific course or program. In
dictionaries, curriculum is often defined as
the courses offered by a school, but it is rarely used in such a general sense
in schools. Depending on how broadly educators define or employ the
term, curriculum typically refers to the knowledge and skills
students are expected to learn, which includes the learning standards or learning objectives they are expected to meet;
the units and lessons that teachers teach; the assignments and projects given
to students; the books, materials, videos, presentations, and readings used in
a course; and the tests, assessments, and other methods used to evaluate student
learning. An individual teacher’s curriculum, for example, would be the
specific learning standards, lessons, assignments, and materials used to
organize and teach a particular course.
When the terms curriculum or curricula are used in educational contexts without
qualification, specific examples, or additional explanation, it may be
difficult to determine precisely what the terms are referring to—mainly because
they could be applied to either all or only some of the component parts of a
school’s academic program or courses.
In many cases, teachers develop
their own curricula, often refining and improving them over years, although it
is also common for teachers to adapt lessons and syllabi created by other
teachers, use curriculum templates and guides to structure their lessons and
courses, or purchase prepackaged curricula from individuals and companies. In
some cases, schools purchase comprehensive, multigrade curriculum
packages—often in a particular subject area, such as mathematics—that teachers
are required to use or follow. Curriculum may also encompass a school’s
academic requirements for graduation, such as the courses students have to take
and pass, the number of credits students must complete, and other requirements,
such as completing a capstone project or a certain number of
community-service hours. Generally speaking, curriculum takes many different
forms in schools—too many to comprehensively catalog here.
It is important to note that
while curriculum encompasses a wide variety of potential educational and
instructional practices, educators often have a very precise, technical meaning
in mind when they use the term. Most teachers spend a lot of time thinking
about, studying, discussing, and analyzing curriculum, and many educators have
acquired a specialist’s expertise in curriculum development—i.e., they know how
to structure, organize, and deliver lessons in ways that facilitate or
accelerate
student learning. To noneducators, some curriculum materials may seem simple or straightforward (such as a list of required reading, for example), but they may reflect a deep and sophisticated understanding of an academic discipline and of the most effective strategies for learning acquisition and classroom management.
student learning. To noneducators, some curriculum materials may seem simple or straightforward (such as a list of required reading, for example), but they may reflect a deep and sophisticated understanding of an academic discipline and of the most effective strategies for learning acquisition and classroom management.
Reform
Since curriculum is one of the
foundational elements of effective schooling and teaching, it is often the
object of reforms, most of which are broadly intended to either mandate or
encourage greater curricular standardization and consistency across states,
schools, grade levels, subject areas, and courses. The following are a few
representative examples of the ways in which curriculum is targeted for
improvement or used to leverage school improvement and increase teacher
effectiveness:
·
Standards requirements: When new learning
standards are adopted at the state, district, or school levels, teachers
typically modify what they teach and bring their curriculum into “alignment” with the learning expectations
outlined in the new standards. While the technical alignment of curriculum with
standards does not necessarily mean that teachers are teaching in accordance
with the standards—or, more to the point, that students are actually achieving
those learning expectations—learning standards remain a mechanism by which
policy makers and school leaders attempt to improve curriculum and teaching
quality. The Common Core
State Standards Initiative, for example, is a national effort to influence
curriculum design and teaching quality in schools through the adoption of new
learning standards by states.
·
Assessment requirements: Another reform strategy that indirectly
influences curriculum is assessment, since the methods used to measure student
learning compel teachers to teach the content and skills that will eventually
be evaluated. The most commonly discussed examples are standardized
testing and high-stakes testing, which can give rise to a
phenomenon informally called “teaching to the test.” Because federal and state
policies require students to take standardized tests at certain grade levels,
and because regulatory penalties or negative publicity may result from poor
student performance (in the case of high-stakes tests), teachers are consequently
under pressure to teach in ways that are likely to improve student performance
on standardized tests—e.g., by teaching the content likely to be tested or by
coaching students on specific test-taking techniques. While standardized tests
are one way in which assessment is used to leverage curriculum reform, schools
may also use rubrics and many other strategies
to improve teaching quality through the modification of assessment strategies,
requirements, and expectations.
·
Curriculum alignment: Schools may try to improve curriculum quality
by bringing teaching activities and course expectations into “alignment” with learning standards and
other school courses—a practice sometimes called “curriculum mapping.” The
basic idea is to create a more consistent and coherent academic program by
making sure that teachers teach the most important content and eliminate
learning gaps that may exist between sequential courses and grade levels. For
example, teachers may review their mathematics program to ensure that what
students are actually being taught in every Algebra I course offered in the
school not only reflects expected learning standards for that subject area and
grade level, but that it also prepares students for Algebra II and geometry.
When the curriculum is not aligned, students might be taught significantly
different content in each Algebra I course, for example, and students taking
different Algebra I courses may complete the courses unevenly prepared for
Algebra II. For a more detailed discussion, see coherent curriculum.
·
Curriculum philosophy: The design and goals of any curriculum
reflect the educational philosophy—whether intentionally or unintentionally—of
the educators who developed it. Consequently, curriculum reform may occur
through the adoption of a different philosophy or model of teaching by a school
or educator. Schools that follow the Expeditionary Learning model, for example, embrace a variety of
approaches to teaching generally known as project-based learning, which encompasses related
strategies such as community-based learning and authentic
learning. In
Expeditionary Learning schools, students complete multifaceted projects called
“expeditions” that require teachers to develop and structure curriculum in ways
that are quite different from the more traditional approaches commonly used in
schools.
·
Curriculum packages: In some cases, schools decide to purchase or
adopt a curriculum package that has been developed by an outside organization.
One well-known and commonly used option for American public schools is International Baccalaureate, which offers curriculum
programs for elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools. Districts
may purchase all three programs or an individual school may purchase only one,
and the programs may be offered to all or only some of the students in a
school. When schools adopt a curriculum package, teachers often receive
specialized training to ensure that the curriculum is effectively implemented
and taught. In many cases, curriculum packages are purchased or adopted because
they are perceived to be of a higher quality or more prestigious than the
existing curriculum options offered by a school or independently developed by
teachers.
·
Curriculum resources: The resources that schools provide to
teachers can also have a significant affect on curriculum. For example, if a
district or school purchases a certain set of textbooks and requires teachers
to use them, those textbooks will inevitably influence what gets taught and how
teachers teach. Technology purchases are another example of resources that have
the potential to influence curriculum. If all students are given laptops and
all classrooms are outfitted with interactive whiteboards, for example,
teachers can make significant changes in what they teach and how they teach to
take advantage of these new technologies (for a more detailed discussion of
this example, see one-to-one). In most cases, however, new
curriculum resources require schools to invest in professional development that helps teachers use the
new resources effectively, given that simply providing new resources without
investing in teacher education and training may fail to bring about desired
improvements. In addition, the type of professional development provided to teachers
can also have a major influence on curriculum development and design.
·
Curriculum standardization: States, districts, and schools may also try
to improve teaching quality and effectiveness by requiring, or simply
encouraging, teachers to use either a standardized curriculum or common
processes for developing curriculum. While the strategies used to promote more
standardized curricula can vary widely from state to state or school to school,
the general goal is to increase teaching quality through greater curricular
consistency. School performance will likely improve, the reasoning goes, if
teaching methods and learning expectations are based on sound principles and
consistently applied throughout a state, district, or school. Curriculum
standards may also be created or proposed by influential educational
organizations—such as the National Science Teachers Association or the National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics, for example—with the purpose of guiding learning expectations and
teaching within particular academic disciplines.
·
Curriculum scripting: Often called “scripted curriculum,” the
scripting of curriculum is the most prescriptive form of standardized,
prepackaged curriculum, since it typically requires teachers to not only follow
a particular sequence of preprepared lessons, but to actually read aloud from a
teaching script in class. While the professional autonomy and creativity of
individual teachers may be significantly limited when such a curriculum system
is used, the general rationale is that teaching quality can be assured or
improved, or at least maintained, across a school or educational
system if
teachers follow a precise instructional script. While not every teacher will be
a naturally excellent teacher, the reasoning goes, all teachers can at least be
given a high-quality curriculum script to follow. Scripted curricula tend to be
most common in districts and schools that face significant challenges attracting
and retaining experienced or qualified teachers, such as larger urban schools
in high-poverty communities.
Creative Curriculum Solutions
For
over 25 years, Teaching Strategies has believed that the best and most powerful
way to improve child outcomes is through effective teaching. And that’s why
we’ve created forward-thinking, comprehensive, research-based and
research-proven curriculum resources. These help preschool teachers and
infants, toddlers and twos caregivers to be their most effective, while still
honoring their creativity and respecting their critical role in making learning
exciting and relevant for every child.
Our
supportive curriculum solutions are used by early childhood educators across
the country, helping them to offer developmentally appropriate programs that
support active learning and promote children’s progress in all developmental
areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment