Saturday, April 15, 2017

MCQs The Constitution of Pakistatn 1973 , FOR ADPP, DIRECTOR , ADJ, CJ, JM & LAW officer EXAMINATIONS

MCQs The Constitution of Pakistatn 1973 , FOR ADPP, DIRECTOR , ADJ, CJ, JM & LAW officer EXAMINATIONS

1. 
Constitution of 1973 was authenticated and published in the official Gazette on
23rd March, 1973
12th May, 1973
12th April, 1973
Answer: Option C
2. 
The Constitution of 1973 came into force on
23rd March, 1973
12th May, 1973
14th August, 1973
Answer: Option C
3. 
Constitution of 1973 consist
250 Articles,
280 Articles
285 Articles
Answer: Option B
4. 
Constitution of 1973 consist ______
6 schedules
7 schedules
8 schedules
Answer: Option B
5. 
Objectives Resolution was passed on
January, 1949
February, 1949
March, 1949
None of above
Answer: Option C
6. 
According to Objectives Resolution sovereignty over the entire Universe belongs to
Public of Pakistan
Almighty Allah
Government of Pakistan
None of above
Answer: Option B
7. 
According to Objectives Resolution authority enjoyed by the peoples of Pakistan within limits prescribed by Almighty Allah as sacred _______
Trust
Right
Duty
None of above
Answer: Option A

MCQs The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinancee 1962 , FOR ADPP, DIRECTOR , ADJ, CJ, JM & LAW officer EXAMINATIONS

MCQs The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinancee 1962 , FOR ADPP, DIRECTOR , ADJ, CJ, JM & LAW officer EXAMINATIONS

1. 
The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance was enacted on
8th December, 1961
9th January, 1962
8th February, 1962
None of above
Answer: Option B
2. 
The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962 consists ______ sections
26
27
28
None of above
Answer: Option C
3. 
The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962 contains _____ schedule
2
3
4
None of above
Answer: Option D
4. 
Section 2, of the West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance deals with
Definitions
Kinds of Civil Courts
Kinds of Court's staffs
None of above
Answer: Option A
5. 
According to The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962 section 2(a), "Government" means
Local Government
Provincial Government
Federal Government
None of above
Answer: Option B
6. 
As per section 2(b), of The West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, "High Court" means
High Court of any province
High Court of concerned province
Both (a) and (b)
None of above
Answer: Option B
7. 
Section 2
Suit
Land
Suit land
None of above
Answer: Option B
8. 
The suits relating to land or to any right or interest in land is called
Suit
Land suit
Miscellaneous suits
None of above
Answer: Option B
9. 
Small cause means of the nature cognizable by the Court of small causes under the Provincial Small Causes Courts Act,
1885
1886
1887
None of above
Answer: Option C

10. 
Unclassed suit means a suit which is neither
A small cause
A land suit
Both (a) and (b)
None of above
Answer: Option C
11. 
The term "value" used with reference to a suit means the amount or value of the
Court fee
Subject matter of the suit
Both (a) and (b)
None of above
Answer: Option B

MCQs The Specific Relief Act of 1877 , FOR ADPP, DIRECTOR , ADJ, CJ, JM & LAW officer EXAMINATIONS


MCQs The Specific Relief Act of 1877 , FOR ADPP, DIRECTOR , ADJ, CJ, JM & LAW officer EXAMINATIONS


1. 
The Specific Relief Act of 1877 was enacted on
7th February, 1877
7th March, 1877
7th April, 1877
Answer: Option A
2. 
The Specific Relief Act, was enforced on
1st March 1877
1st April 1877
1st May 1877
Answer: Option C
3. 
The Specific Relief Act contain_____, sections
55
57
59
Answer: Option B
4. 
The Specific Relief Act, of 1877 contains_____ schedule
1
2
None of the above
Answer: Option C
5. 
The Specific Relief Act is_____ kind of law
Penal
Specific
Fiscal
Answer: Option B
6. 
As per section 3, of Specific Relief Act every duty enforceable by law is called
Duty
Legal duty
Obligation
Answer: Option C
7. 
Any instrument (other than a will or codicil as defined by the Indian Succession Act) whereby the destination or devolution of successive interest in movable and immovable property is disposed of or is agreed to be disposed of is called
Affidavit
Power of attorney
Instrument
Settlement
Answer: Option D
8. 
Relief can not be granted for agreements which are
Enforceable by law
Not enforceable by law
Both (a) and (b)
Answer: Option B
9. 
Section______, of the Specific Relief Act provide ways of relief granting
5
6
7
Answer: Option A
10. 
As per section 5, of The Specific Relief Act provides_____ ways through which relief can be given
5
7
10
Answer: Option A

Thursday, March 30, 2017

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

CORRECTION IN DATE OF BIRTH

CORRECTION IN DATE OF BIRTH
جيڪڏهن ڪنهن جي شناختي ڪارڊ ۾ ڄم جي تاريخ يا نالي م ڪا غلطي ٿي وڃي سينئر سول ڪورٽ ڪيس داخل ڪري صحيح ڪرائي سگهجي ٿو جنهن جو ٽائيم ڪارڊ جاري ٿيڻ کانپو۽ ڇھ سال آهي۔
agr kisi k NIC (sanakhti card) me koi galti he age me ya name to wo 6 year andar yani card hone se suit dakhil karake sahi karaskta he oske bad agr suit huwa to wo dismissed hojaega.
S. 42---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art.120---Suit for declaration---Limitation---Period prescribed for filing of declaratory suit was six (6) years. 2015 MLD 1481                                                                      

Correction of date of Birth of plaintiff would not adversely affect any right of any other person - No provision existed to prohibit NADRA from rectifying any mistake in CNIC.
2016 YLR 323 Sindh


 scmr 2015 page 456 hisab se ap ka ye case service terbunal me file hoga.


2012 YLR 161 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD MALIK AFZAL
Side Opponent : MOHD NOOR
date of birth ---national identity card , entries of ---Evidentiary value---Such entries would carry presumption of truth. 

: 2011 SCMR 21 SUPREME-COURT
Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SHARIF
Side Opponent : CHIEF SECRETARY
R.12-A---Retirement age---Determination---Grievance of civil servant was that his date of retirement had wrongly been calculated from seniority list---Civil servant relied upon his date of birth mentioned in his Secondary School Certificate, Computerized national identity card and Service Book---Validity---date of birth of civil servant mentioned in Service Book could not be ignored as it was the most authenticated document---date of birth mentioned in seniority lists could not be ,referred over date of birth mentioned in Service Book--Supreme Court accepted the date of birth of civil servant mentioned in Secondary School Certificate, Computerized national identity card and Service Book---Supreme Court converted petition for leave to appeal into appeal and set aside notification of retirement of civil servant---Appeal was allowed.

FOR Date Of Birth CORRECTION
2016 YLR 323
2011 CLC 511
2009 YLR 1296
1997 MLD 2801




Latest and Great law citation on correction in date of brith in CNIC with logical arguments.

2016 Y L R 323 [Sindh]
Before Zafar Ahmed Rajput, J
(IMRAN KHAN Versus
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Interior and 3 others---Respondents)

(a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)---

Malicious prosecution

Malicious prosecution

---Suit for damages on basis of malicious prosecution arising out of a criminal charge---Conditions essential to constitute a cause of action for such suit stated.
Malicious prosecution was an abuse of the process of the court by wrongfully setting the law in motion on a criminal charge. To be actionable as a tort the prosecution must have been malicious and terminated in favour of the plaintiff. For an action for malicious prosecution plaintiff had to prove that:
(i) he was prosecuted by the defendant of a criminal charge;
(ii) the proceedings complained of terminated in his favour;
(iii) the defendant instituted or carried on such prosecution maliciously or in other words the prosecution was instituted and carried on with a malicious intent;
(iv) there was absence of reasonable and probable cause for such proceedings; and
(v) he had suffered damage.
P L D 2013 Lahore 170
Before Abdul Sattar Asghar, J

ABDUL MAJEED and others---Petitioners
Versus
MANZOOR HUSSAIN and others---Respondents

CORRECTION IN DATE OF BIRTH

CORRECTION IN DATE OF BIRTH
PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. Versus MUHAMMAD ALI
S.42--
Date of brith was corected.
Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Art. 120 ---Suit for declaration---Date of birth recorded in Service Record, correction of---Plaintiff (employee of Pakistan Steel Mills) alleged that his date of birth had wrongly been recorded in Service Record as 21-12-1951 instead of year 1956---Defendant-employer's plea was that suit was time-barred for having been filed after 30 years of joining service---Proof---Year of date of plaintiff birth was mentioned as 1956 in his old and new National Identity Cards, authenticity whereof had not been challenged by defendant---Joining report relied upon by defendant had been admitted by its witness not to be in handwriting of plaintiff---Defendant's witness admitted that plaintiff's date of birth recorded in Medical Card and Insurance paper was year 1956---According to plaintiff that he came to know about such wrong entry in his service record, when he applied for loan and he was informed that he was going to retire in year 2011 according to his date of birth i.e 1951, but defendant declined to correct same in year 2008---Defendant had failed to establish that plaintiff was in knowledge of such entry in Service Record prior to year 2008---Defendant had not produced any Rules/Regulations governing terms and conditions of its employees barring alteration in their date of birth---Suit was decreed in circumstances.
2014 MLD 440 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. Versus MUHAMMAD ALI

CORRECTION IN DATE OF BIRTH

CORRECTION IN DATE OF BIRTH
2011 CLC 265
2008 SCMR 713
2005 SCMR 152 
2009 YLR 1296 
تاريخ پيدائش جي درتگي لاء اعليٰ عدالتن جا ڏنل تاريخي فيصلا ۔ ۔
CORRECTION IN DATE OF BIRTH 
(S.42 specific relief Act) Suit For Declaration... Plaintiff sought correction in his date of birth in record of Board of Intermediate Secondary Education (defendents) ..Trial court dismissed suit & lower appellate court dismissed appeal. Validity: Evidence produced by board could not rebut plaintiff's date of birth mentioned in birth certificate.... plaintiff a young college student could not be presumed to have instituted the suit in order to gain any undue advantage to the detriment of any one else...concurrent findings of lower court have resulted in grave miscarriage of justice and the same could not be sustained.. Revision was accepted.

WHY YOU ANGRY